Evidence From Humans
 
Print this page
Types of dietary fat and breast cancer: a pooled analysis of cohort studies
Smith-Warner, S. A., Spiegelman, D., Adami, H. O., Beeson, W. L., van den Brandt, P. A., Folsom, A. R., Fraser, G. E., Freudenheim, J. L., Goldbohm, R. A., Graham, S., Kushi, L. H., Miller, A. B., Rohan, T. E., Speizer, F. E., Toniolo, P., Willett, W. C., Wolk, A., Zeleniuch-Jacquotte, A., Hunter, D. J. Int J Cancer. 2001. 92:5, 767-74.
Study design
Pooled analysis of 9 cohort studies
Funding agency
ACS; NIH
Study Participants
Menopausal Status
The menopausal status of women included in this study is listed here.
Post menopausal
Pre menopausal
Number in Cohort
Cohort 351,821
Country where study was conducted
6 USA, 1 Canada, 1 Sweden, 1 Netherlands
Participant selection: Inclusion and exclusion criteria
Criteria used to select participants in the study.
In: Pooling Project. Studies with at least 200 incident breast cancer cases, assessment of usual intake of foods and nutrients, validation study of the diet assessment method or a closely related instrument Ex: Criteria used by each study, and participants reporting energy intakes greater or less than 3 standard deviations from the study specific log.e-transformed mean energy intake of the baseline population, had missing alcohol intake data or reported a history of cancer (except non-melanoma skin cancer) at baseline
Exposure Investigated
Exposures investigated
Fat, total, saturated, monusaturated, polyunsaturated
How exposure was measured
Questionnaire, self-administered, FFQ
Exposure assessment comment
FFQ: 45 to 150 food items
Statistical Analysis
Ethnic groups with separate analysis
If this study provided a separate analysis by ethnic or racial group, the groups are listed here.
No
Confounders considered
Other breast cancer risk factors, such as family history, age at first birth, and hormone replacement therapy use, that were taken into account in the study.
Not considered: Race
Genetic characterization included
If the study analyzed relationships between environmental factors and inherited genetic variations, this field will be marked “Yes.” “No”, if not.
No
Description of major analysis
Adjusted IRR with 95% CI, mutually adjusted for subtypes of fat, multivariate nutrient density model , each type of fat modeled as continuous variable for 5% increase of intake, effect modifier of menopausal status, parity, fiber, hormone replacement ther
Strength of associations reported
Total fat: 1.00 (0.98-1.03); saturated fat: 1.09 (1.00-1.19); monounsaturated fat: 0.93 (0.84-1.03); polyunsaturated fat 1.05 (0.96-1.16)
Results Comments
No association was observed for saturated, monounsaturated and polyunsaturated fat intake and risk of breast cancer.
Author address
Department of Nutrition, Harvard School of Public Health, 665 Huntington Ave., Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Privacy notice   |   Copyright statement